Re: Z beats Mustang V6's?
Stock time for all Zs before the 300s were pretty slow, 0-60 in the 7s or higher (260s were around 10 seconds!), and the 99+ V6 Mustang, which weighs 3180, (less than a 300z) and gets to 60 in 7.1 seconds. Not bad for a car that gets 28 Mpg, and has power steering, windows, mirrors, seats, no rust and a great radio, and clean exhaust.
There are many 99+ 3.8 Mustangs that run low 14s with very few bolt-on mods, and get into the 13s with a blower or nitros, pass emmisions and drive on the street every day.
I know this because I own 2 2000 3.8 Mustangs, and I've timed mine, and seen time slips, many are posted at V6power.net.
Stock 99+ hit the rev limiter at 113 Mph, but can be easily reprogrammed.
My 2000 Mustang is much steadier at 110 than my Z is at 90.
My 71 240z weighs about 2200lbs, has about 140 hp, (much less torque) no smog stuff (not required here in CA) and runs similar times to the Mustangs, is more fun to drive on short trips, and gets more attention, and is much more lovable.
As much as I love the Z, I still cannot even see a new 350Z, and will probably not be able to buy one, but anyone can own a new Mustang. Nissan priced the Z out of the Market, due to bad decisions, and Mustangs keep rolling off the assembly line. Ford has made alot of crappy Mustangs, but they have recovered, and the new ones are pretty nice. For under 20K you can get a 4.6 GT that will hit high 13s right from the factory. I'd like to see Nissan be competitive when the new Z comes out.