The environmental impact...long
Removing the cat may or may not affect your tailpipe test. This depends on the condition of your engine, and the levels of pollution allowed in your area. If your engine is very efficient, the levels of NOx may be low enough to pass without the CAT installed, but if your engine was running poorly and had the CAT installed, it would still pass. So, it can be a gamble, depending on how confident you are with the tune of your engine.
Case and point: My engine is a 2.8L with triple webers and while tuning it, it was hooked up to a exhaust analyzer. It turned out that my 2.8L put out only 200ppm more NOx than a typical 280Z with fuel injection and CAT installed. The reason for this is that my engine is more efficient. However, if I was to install a CAT, my emissions would be much lower than that of the stock 280Z, since I'm already more efficient to begin with. Personally, I'd keep a CAT if I had one. I'd just get a free-flow design. Many companies make such CATs, and they don't rob horsepower like they used to. The stock Datsun CATs are quite old (15+years) and were of an older design. I wouldn't be surprised if they were robbing significant amounts of hp, due to them falling apart, and becoming a restriction. Just replace it with a new one. I used to have a HONDA, and always ran the CAT. There was only a SLIGHT increase in hp with it removed. Actually, the engine liked the backpressure that it provided. It had a better torque curve with the CAT installed. So I voted to keep the CAT installed, and have cleaner running engine (and air), for the sake of a few hp.
The CAT is used to convert NOx (Nitrogen oxides) back into Nitrogen and Oxygen using a catalyst (hence the name catalytic converter). NO engine is 100% efficient. Fuel injection, powerful sparks, re-designed combustion chambers, etc... all help to make the engine more efficient. But, man has yet to make a 100% efficient internal combustion engine. You can get emissions extremely low (Honda has a ULEV Accord), but they still exist, and will not go away completely.
Alternative fuels (propane, hydrogen) do not need a CAT. This is because they are of a different molecular compound than gasoline, and the product of their combustion is not the same.
Of course less emissions are better than more. This is why a CAT is used. It cleans up the unburned gases and reduces them back to their original elements. Otherwise these 'radicals' can begin reacting with other elements and create smog, which causes lung problems, which causes acid rain, which eats away at buildings, paint etc....
Guess my California upbringing is evident now.
Just my .02
240Dave
Removing the cat may or may not affect your tailpipe test. This depends on the condition of your engine, and the levels of pollution allowed in your area. If your engine is very efficient, the levels of NOx may be low enough to pass without the CAT installed, but if your engine was running poorly and had the CAT installed, it would still pass. So, it can be a gamble, depending on how confident you are with the tune of your engine.
Case and point: My engine is a 2.8L with triple webers and while tuning it, it was hooked up to a exhaust analyzer. It turned out that my 2.8L put out only 200ppm more NOx than a typical 280Z with fuel injection and CAT installed. The reason for this is that my engine is more efficient. However, if I was to install a CAT, my emissions would be much lower than that of the stock 280Z, since I'm already more efficient to begin with. Personally, I'd keep a CAT if I had one. I'd just get a free-flow design. Many companies make such CATs, and they don't rob horsepower like they used to. The stock Datsun CATs are quite old (15+years) and were of an older design. I wouldn't be surprised if they were robbing significant amounts of hp, due to them falling apart, and becoming a restriction. Just replace it with a new one. I used to have a HONDA, and always ran the CAT. There was only a SLIGHT increase in hp with it removed. Actually, the engine liked the backpressure that it provided. It had a better torque curve with the CAT installed. So I voted to keep the CAT installed, and have cleaner running engine (and air), for the sake of a few hp.
The CAT is used to convert NOx (Nitrogen oxides) back into Nitrogen and Oxygen using a catalyst (hence the name catalytic converter). NO engine is 100% efficient. Fuel injection, powerful sparks, re-designed combustion chambers, etc... all help to make the engine more efficient. But, man has yet to make a 100% efficient internal combustion engine. You can get emissions extremely low (Honda has a ULEV Accord), but they still exist, and will not go away completely.
Alternative fuels (propane, hydrogen) do not need a CAT. This is because they are of a different molecular compound than gasoline, and the product of their combustion is not the same.
Of course less emissions are better than more. This is why a CAT is used. It cleans up the unburned gases and reduces them back to their original elements. Otherwise these 'radicals' can begin reacting with other elements and create smog, which causes lung problems, which causes acid rain, which eats away at buildings, paint etc....
Guess my California upbringing is evident now.
Just my .02
240Dave